Skip to content
RegulensR
Policy & BRD automation now in early access

From Indian regulation to clear action.

Regulens monitors 780+ Central and state authorities, scopes every notification against your entities, sites and licences, and decomposes each applicable instrument into testable obligations — propagated through your organisation down to the plant, function, process and person responsible for acting on it.

Three-week scoped pilot on your own footprint. No self-serve trial — the product is only meaningful once it is configured against your entities and sites.

Obligations mapped
69,000+
Obligations mapped

Decomposed from Central Acts, Rules, state legislation and municipal bye-laws.

States & UTs tracked
28
States & UTs tracked

Every state variant maintained separately, because they genuinely differ.

Authorities monitored
780+
Authorities monitored

Central ministries, regulators, state departments and local bodies.

Clauses with jail risk
26,000+
Clauses with jail risk

Obligations carrying imprisonment exposure for directors and officers.

Trusted by compliance functions in manufacturing, pharma, IT, BFSI and retail

Anantha MotorsSahyadri PharmaVindhya SteelKaveri RetailMeghdoot PowerTrishul LogisticsNandan ChemicalsPrayag Finserv

The problem

Regulatory programmes rarely fail by missing a rule

They fail in the gap between knowing a rule exists and knowing what it means for you. That gap has four parts, and a publication feed addresses only the first.

01

Detection

Something was notified. This is the least demanding stage — gazettes and state portals publish openly, and the raw feed costs nothing to obtain.

8% of the effort

02

Applicability

Does it apply to this site, this state, this licence, this category? Not to the sector in general — to this specific plant.

19% of the effort

03

Decomposition

Converting an Act, its Rules and the relevant state amendment into individual obligations that can be owned, controlled and tested. Skilled, unglamorous work.

30% of the effort

04

Impact

Determining which site, function, process and owner must act — including the second and third-order impacts that manual review typically misses.

43% of the effort

Figures from our 2026 benchmark of 268 Indian compliance functions. For a six-state mid-size group, these four stages together consume roughly 324 hours a month — approximately two full-time equivalents, before any remediation work begins.

The platform

One connected model, built up in stages

Each stage builds on the register and the organisational graph the stage before it created. There is no starting again to move from knowing to acting to proving.

Generally availableLive today

Know and assess

Find every Central, state and municipal obligation that applies to each of your sites, break it into atomic obligations, and understand precisely which division, plant and person is affected.

  • Continuous monitoring of 780+ Central and state authorities
  • Applicability scoping against your entities, sites, states and licences
  • Obligation decomposition with section-level traceability
  • Impact analysis down to site, function, process and system
  • Automated insight digests and board-ready reporting
Early accessRolling out through 2026

Translate into action

Turn an obligation into the artefacts a compliance or change programme actually needs: updated SOPs and policies, and complete business requirements documents.

  • Policy impact mapping — which SOP clauses a notification breaks
  • AI-assisted drafting and redlining with section-level citations
  • Full policy lifecycle: draft, review, approve, attest, version
  • End-to-end BRD generation from obligation to acceptance criteria
  • Two-way sync with Jira, Azure DevOps and ServiceNow
Design partnerDesign partners from Q1 2027

Prove compliance continuously

Connect to ERP, HRMS and plant systems so the platform can test whether you actually comply — continuously, and against any new rule you point at it.

  • Read-only connectors into ERP, payroll, plant and transaction systems
  • Rules compiled into executable tests over real records
  • Continuous control monitoring with exception workflow
  • "Am I compliant with this new rule?" answered against live data
  • Immutable evidence trail for inspectors and internal audit

Why Regulens

Six things we do differently, stated plainly

01

Primary sources, not a summary of a newsletter

We read the gazette, not a summary of a summary. Every obligation carries a citation anchor to the section it came from, and that anchor survives amendment.

02

Scoped to your sites, not your sector

Generic sector feeds tell a Bengaluru IT firm about Maharashtra factory rules it will never meet. Regulens scopes against your entities, sites, states and licences and shows its reasoning.

03

The state layer is not an afterthought

All 28 states and 8 union territories are maintained as separate variants — thresholds, forms, return dates — because a Central rule and a state rule are frequently not the same obligation.

04

Obligations as the unit of work

Decomposition into atomic, testable obligations is what makes control mapping, policy linkage and automated testing possible. It is the hardest part and it is the foundation.

05

AI that refuses rather than invents

In this domain a confident wrong answer is a liability — particularly one built on reasoning imported from a legal system that does not apply here. Every claim is cited and verified against its source.

06

Built for the inspector at the gate

Immutable audit trails, evidence packs assembled by obligation, and a defensible record of who knew what and when — because that is what the conversation is eventually about, and because personal liability makes it personal.

Category

Not a feed. Not a GRC platform.

Both have their place. Neither answers the question that occupies most of your team’s week.

DimensionHorizon scanning feedGRC platformRegulens
Primary question answeredWhat was notified?Are our controls working?Which of our sites does this land on, what does it require, and who acts?
Content sourceSummaries of Central notificationsContent you load yourselfCentral, state and municipal primary sources, decomposed into obligations
State coverageRarely, and rarely maintainedNot applicableAll 28 states and UTs maintained as separate variants
ScopingSector levelNot applicableSite, state, headcount, category and licence — with reasoning shown
Licence conditionsNot coveredStored as documentsExtracted from each consent and licence, tracked as obligations
Personal liabilityNot coveredNot modelledNamed role register with imprisonment exposure mapped per obligation

Most customers retain their existing GRC platform and integrate with it. Regulens provides the intelligence, obligation and impact layer that sits above it.

Outcomes

What compliance teams use the platform for

Regulatory change management

Run the full lifecycle from gazette notification to implemented control as one instrumented pipeline — detection, scoping, assessment, action, evidence — with SLAs and ownership at every stage.

  • Central, state and municipal sources monitored together
  • Automated impact propagation across entities, plants and functions
  • Handoff to delivery tooling with traceability preserved
  • Complete, immutable audit trail of every decision

Multi-state and multi-site compliance

The defining Indian problem: one Central rule, thirty-six state variants, and municipal rules underneath. Each site gets exactly the obligations that apply to it, with the state delta made explicit.

  • All 28 states and 8 union territories maintained separately
  • Municipal bye-laws and trade licence obligations included
  • Per-site scoping by state, category, capacity and process
  • State delta shown against the Central position

Licence and consent management

Build the complete licence inventory most organisations discover they have never had, extract the conditions written into each one, and manage renewals against real application lead times.

  • Every licence, consent and registration per site
  • Conditions extracted and tracked as obligations
  • Renewal alerting based on lead time, not expiry date
  • Named holder and personal exposure recorded

Director and officer liability

A large share of Indian compliance obligations carry imprisonment exposure for named individuals. Make that exposure visible to the people who carry it, and evidence the systems that mitigate it.

  • 26,000+ clauses with imprisonment exposure identified
  • Named occupier, officer-in-default and KMP mapping
  • Evidence supporting the Section 134(5) assertion
  • Time-stamped record of detection, assignment and closure

Industries

Coverage tuned to the regimes you actually operate under

Sectoral licensing and product rules stack on top of the horizontal domains. Depth and taxonomy differ by sector, and so does what we can honestly claim.

Regulatory news desk

Published daily by our research team

Primary-source analysis of what changed and what it means operationally — not a summary of a press release.

All regulatory news

In their words

What changed for our customers

“The first honest answer to "what applies to this plant" took us three weeks to produce manually. It now takes a click, and it is more complete than the answer we produced.”
Head of EHS, a specialty chemicals group
“Our named occupier had never been shown the specific obligations he could be prosecuted for. Showing him changed how the site ran within a month.”
Group Compliance Head, a multi-plant manufacturer
“We stopped arguing about whether we had seen a notification and started arguing about which of our sites it landed on. That is a much better argument to be having.”
Company Secretary, a listed engineering company
“The copilot saying "the rules for that state have not been notified yet" is the feature that made our legal team trust the rest of it.”
General Counsel, a national logistics operator

See it scoped to your own sites, not a demo tenant

We configure your entities, sites and states, then run live intelligence for three weeks so you can compare the output against what your team found in the same period. If the platform does not outperform your current process, we will tell you.